PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
9.40%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-32.38%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.37%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
13.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.40%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.48%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.93%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.07%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.22%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-53.56%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.18%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.05%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.07%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of MAXN's 100.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-86.15%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
296.39%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.39%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.78%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.78%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.45%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.12%
Share count change of 0.12% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.