PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-62.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-61.31%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-65.00%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.57%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.85%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
3.64%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.46%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-92.16%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.31%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.87%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.14%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
42.48%
Other expenses growth less than half of MAXN's 100.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-121.99%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-158.06%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-107.11%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.78%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.05%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-108.75%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.49%
Share count change of 0.49% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-19.53%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.