PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.24%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.75%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-19.88%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-26.65%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.96%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-13.40%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.04%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.25%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.30%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.89%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.95%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.02%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 49.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of MAXN's 66.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.25%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 39.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.99%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MAXN's 70.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.83%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 46.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
108.99%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
Net income growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.99%
Net margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 51.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.74%
EPS change of 17.74% while MAXN is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
17.74%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.64%
Share count change of 0.64% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.