PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.52%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
76.12%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-124.82%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-117.66%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.25%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.93%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.49%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.97%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.41%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.98%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2230.96%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1558.79%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2818.90%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1977.19%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.06%
Similar other expenses growth to MAXN's 100.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-368.72%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-235.61%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-578.55%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-382.88%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count change of 0.17% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.17%
Diluted share change of 0.17% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.