PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.34%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-25.07%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
105.72%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 73.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
105.74%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 51.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.71%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.93%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.67%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.70%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
73.10%
Similar EBITDA growth to MAXN's 72.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
73.01%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 49.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
46.08%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MAXN's 66.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
45.90%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 39.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-424.62%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MAXN's 70.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.80%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 46.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.85%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.28%
Net income growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.04%
Net margin growth 50-75% of MAXN's 51.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
30.93%
EPS change of 30.93% while MAXN is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
30.93%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MAXN's 73.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Share count change of 0.39% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.