PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
35.46%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
44.94%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-171.55%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-152.82%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.20%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
6.03%
G&A growth while MAXN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.30%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.19%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.71%
D&A growth while MAXN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2510.65%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1827.29%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-930.10%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-660.46%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
42.83%
Other expenses growth less than half of MAXN's 100.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-653.72%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-456.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.41%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-948.31%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-673.91%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-946.15%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-943.59%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count change of 0.00% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.07%
Diluted share change of 0.07% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.