PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.83%
Revenue growth below 50% of MAXN's 6.33%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-3.36%
Cost reduction while MAXN shows 8.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.37%
Positive growth while MAXN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
21.37%
Margin expansion while MAXN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.06%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.36%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.48%
Total costs growth less than half of MAXN's 5.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.65%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.18%
Similar D&A growth to MAXN's 4.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
101.47%
EBITDA growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.46%
EBITDA margin growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1056.53%
Operating income growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1048.70%
Operating margin growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
220.00%
Other expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
241.07%
Pre-tax income growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
239.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
53.58%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
255.43%
Net income growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
254.16%
Net margin growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
248.28%
EPS growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
239.29%
Diluted EPS growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.84%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 13.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
13.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MAXN's 13.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.