PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.76%
Revenue growth below 50% of MAXN's 25.35%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.49%
Cost growth less than half of MAXN's 32.73%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-2.26%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.77%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 24.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.25%
Total costs growth less than half of MAXN's 26.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-22.01%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-43.36%
D&A reduction while MAXN shows 13.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
749.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 15.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
710.71%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 36.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.21%
Operating income growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 3.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-261.33%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 48.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-212.06%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 28.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.53%
Tax expense growth less than half of MAXN's 114.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-212.19%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 15.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-207.09%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 32.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-213.95%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 18.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-225.64%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 18.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 4.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-11.05%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 4.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.