PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.91%
Revenue decline while MAXN shows 0.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.65%
Cost reduction while MAXN shows 1.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
41.64%
Positive growth while MAXN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.49%
Margin expansion while MAXN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.78%
R&D growth less than half of MAXN's 29.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-72.18%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 98.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.54%
Operating expenses reduction while MAXN shows 7.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.16%
Total costs reduction while MAXN shows 2.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.42%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.61%
Similar D&A growth to MAXN's 7.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-115.01%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 15.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.47%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 33.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
67.92%
Operating income growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.78%
Operating margin growth while MAXN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-106.72%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 71.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-145.34%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 12.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 13.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-179.60%
Tax expense reduction while MAXN shows 181.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-262.89%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 23.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-278.82%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 24.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-258.33%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 23.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-258.33%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 23.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.21%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.38%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.