PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of MAXN's 17.45%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.05%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 4.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-0.76%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 227.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.07%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 208.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.04%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.13%
Operating expenses reduction while MAXN shows 114.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MAXN's 10.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
70.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MAXN's 5.51%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
41.05%
D&A growth above 1.5x MAXN's 4.20%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-86.01%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.62%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 21.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
76.66%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 69.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
68.99%
Similar operating margin growth to MAXN's 73.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-108.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-96.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-191.86%
Tax expense reduction while MAXN shows 1068.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-94.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 9.97%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-8.82%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 9.97% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.