1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.73%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.25%
Margin expansion below 50% of MAXN's 51.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-9.11%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.28%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-69.67%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.49%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
104.85%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 66.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
105.19%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 39.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-89.65%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.70%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-82.70%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.87%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.76%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.32%
Share count change of 6.32% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
115.49%
Diluted share change of 115.49% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.