PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.02%
Similar revenue growth to RUN's 12.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
12.36%
Cost growth 50-75% of RUN's 17.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
19.50%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.81%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.10%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.84%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
10.40%
Similar total costs growth to RUN's 10.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.62%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 26.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
30.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RUN's 870.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.08%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of RUN's 759.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.10%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.01%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 11.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-36.76%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.18%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 3.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of RUN's 14.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.47%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.20%
Net income growth below 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.66%
Net margin growth below 50% of RUN's 396.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 456.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 436.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.47%
Share count reduction while RUN shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.70%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 1.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.