1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
91.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
95.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 17.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
78.70%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.51%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
191.93%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
107.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 26.62%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
29.79%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RUN's 870.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-32.06%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 759.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.93%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-113.57%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 11.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.49%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-111.00%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-105.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 14.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-481.79%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.04%
Net income decline while RUN shows 460.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.26%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 396.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.50%
EPS decline while RUN shows 456.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.50%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 436.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.95%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
14.76%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.