PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
30.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 17.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.12%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.92%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.26%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-21.12%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 10.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.95%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 26.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-97.51%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 870.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.96%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 759.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-437.48%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-340.30%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 11.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.85%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-856.90%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-683.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 14.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.09%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-531.05%
Net income decline while RUN shows 460.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-453.11%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 396.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
EPS decline while RUN shows 456.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-455.50%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 436.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-5.06%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 1.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.