PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.80%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 17.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
28.15%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.42%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-5.61%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 23.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
69.36%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.54%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.54%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.52%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 10.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.76%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 26.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-20.33%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 870.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.41%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 759.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
573.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
430.07%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 11.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-75.73%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.82%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 14.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.18%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
423.62%
Similar net income growth to RUN's 460.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
325.82%
Similar net margin growth to RUN's 396.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
423.08%
Similar EPS growth to RUN's 456.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
423.08%
Similar diluted EPS growth to RUN's 436.85%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.29%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.22%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
10.55%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.