1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.13%
Revenue decline while RUN shows 12.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.51%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 17.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-41.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.33%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.01%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.76%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 10.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
Similar interest expense growth to RUN's 10.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-35.92%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 26.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
88.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RUN's 870.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
85.83%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of RUN's 759.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
84.65%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.78%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 11.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-922.04%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
78.65%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 3.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
73.26%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 14.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-62.66%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.59%
Net income growth below 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
71.94%
Net margin growth below 50% of RUN's 396.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
77.72%
EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 456.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
77.72%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 436.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.54%
Share count reduction while RUN shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 1.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.