PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.59%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
16.38%
Similar cost growth to RUN's 17.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
62.44%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.70%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.68%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-18.00%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 23.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while RUN shows 4.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.58%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.67%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.74%
Interest expense growth less than half of RUN's 10.78%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.42%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 26.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-21.27%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 870.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 759.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Operating income growth below 50% of RUN's 0.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.14%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 11.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-26.00%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.05%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.24%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to RUN's 14.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
681.19%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 14.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.95%
Net income decline while RUN shows 460.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.34%
Net margin growth below 50% of RUN's 396.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.97%
EPS decline while RUN shows 456.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.97%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 436.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.99%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.