PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.65%
Revenue decline while RUN shows 70.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.85%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 68.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-42.24%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 83.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.25%
Margin decline while RUN shows 7.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.99%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 3.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-3.29%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 58.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.86%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 44.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.08%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 55.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.75%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 17.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.30%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 13.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-67.86%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.18%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 6.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.29%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 20.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.21%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-116.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-122.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 21.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-159.97%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-78.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.44%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 13.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.18%
Share count change of 6.18% while RUN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-2.56%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.