PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.49%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 7.97%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
33.96%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 15.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.26%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.28%
R&D growth above 1.5x RUN's 1.85%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-4.34%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.51%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 9.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.27%
Interest expense growth less than half of RUN's 11.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.08%
Similar D&A growth to RUN's 8.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
59.78%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.45%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.84%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
155.83%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.24%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
181.41%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
162.39%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
127.15%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 11.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
74.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 18.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
118.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 13.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
122.22%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 13.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.12%
Share count change of 1.12% while RUN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
6.90%
Diluted share change of 6.90% while RUN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.