PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.58%
Revenue decline while RUN shows 46.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.40%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 32.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.95%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 270.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.69%
Margin decline while RUN shows 153.09% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.87%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 8.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
5.58%
G&A growth while RUN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RUN's 19.01%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.42%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 25.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.69%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 18.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.08%
D&A growth while RUN reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-98.42%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-195.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-242.07%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 29.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.22%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.04%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 27.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.03%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 77.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
167.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 141.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
178.61%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 128.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
168.87%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 133.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
155.10%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 133.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.77%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 22.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
18.91%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 22.34%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.