PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.21%
Revenue decline while RUN shows 13.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.40%
Cost growth less than half of RUN's 21.88%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-11.62%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.46%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.50%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RUN's 22.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.52%
Total costs growth less than half of RUN's 22.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.28%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
18.83%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 1649.38%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-5686.01%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 3.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5697.79%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 15.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-271.71%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 13.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-115.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5596.81%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 114.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-965.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-967.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-920.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1125.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.56%
Share count increase while RUN reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.07%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.