PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.81%
Positive growth while RUN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.85%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
153.84%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 16.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
146.91%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RUN's 17.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.06%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-7.43%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 1.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.44%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 3.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.30%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 0.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.25%
Similar interest expense growth to RUN's 25.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.64%
D&A growth 50-75% of RUN's 6.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
47.82%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
49.24%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.02%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.85%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-38.65%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
25.77%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-88.95%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
33.08%
Net income growth below 50% of RUN's 187.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.90%
Net margin growth below 50% of RUN's 188.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.04%
EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 186.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of RUN's 186.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.01%
Share count change of 1.01% while RUN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.40%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 2.91%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.