PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
73.47%
Positive growth while RUN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
58.28%
Cost increase while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
212.90%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
80.38%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.37%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 3.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-5.45%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
43.73%
Total costs growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.35%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 6.84%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.62%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
73.83%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.91%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.36%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.14%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-192.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.10%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.03%
Tax expense growth less than half of RUN's 209.53%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
42.07%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.61%
Net margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.14%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.14%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.72%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.