PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 7.63%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
76.12%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 7.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-124.82%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 8.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-117.66%
Margin decline while RUN shows 0.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.25%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 18.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.93%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 13.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.49%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.97%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 3.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.41%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 5.39%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
28.98%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 13.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-2230.96%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 26.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1558.79%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 31.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2818.90%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 4.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1977.19%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 11.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.06%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-368.72%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 3.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-235.61%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 129.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-578.55%
Net income decline while RUN shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-382.88%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 59.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
EPS decline while RUN shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-586.21%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.78%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.17%
Diluted share increase while RUN reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.