PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-67.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-59.32%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-214.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-879.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.02%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.33%
G&A growth 50-75% of RUN's 1.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-52.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.54%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 3.86%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-19.70%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 3.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
26.44%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-129.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.95%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-49.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.51%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.02%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
121.25%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.12%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.26%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 2.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.