PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
48.13%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 2.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
44.17%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 9.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
268.96%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
149.08%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.75%
Similar R&D growth to RUN's 6.09%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-0.44%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 10.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RUN's 11.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
34.81%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.66%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.10%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 6.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.02%
Similar D&A growth to RUN's 2.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
45.47%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.19%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.68%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.68%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.80%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.06%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-331.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
42.14%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 10.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
60.94%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 7.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
41.79%
Similar EPS growth to RUN's 52.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
41.79%
Similar diluted EPS growth to RUN's 52.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.66%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 2.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.