PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
35.46%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 3.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
44.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 7.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-171.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.20%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 12.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
6.03%
Similar G&A growth to RUN's 6.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
38.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.19%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of RUN's 18.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
21.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 6.67%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-2510.65%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1827.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-930.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-660.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.83%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-653.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-456.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.41%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-948.31%
Net income decline while RUN shows 111.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-673.91%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 104.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-946.15%
EPS decline while RUN shows 111.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-943.59%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 107.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.71%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share increase while RUN reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.