PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.45%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-42.80%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
144.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 32.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
174.10%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RUN's 34.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.70%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-10.20%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 10.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.02%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 16.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-33.09%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 1.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.57%
Interest expense growth less than half of RUN's 34.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-27.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
88.39%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.51%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.76%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.36%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.71%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
80.98%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.06%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
191.57%
Similar tax expense growth to RUN's 249.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
79.61%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.75%
Net margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.66%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.61%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.49%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.43%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.