PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Revenue growth below 50% of RUN's 17.15%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.97%
Similar cost growth to RUN's 10.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-177.61%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 30.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-172.76%
Margin decline while RUN shows 11.62% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.80%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 14.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-29.30%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 3.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.12%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 7.99%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.34%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RUN's 7.94%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.76%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 6.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RUN's 61.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of RUN's 34.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.93%
Operating income growth below 50% of RUN's 71.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
38.06%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of RUN's 75.88%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-371.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-65.33%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 12.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 25.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-327.69%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 145.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while RUN reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.