PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-16.99%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-392.47%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-546.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.72%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 3.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
16.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.78%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-44.43%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 11.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.54%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-72.14%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
113.65%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.12%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
169.18%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.28%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.58%
Net margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.75%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.75%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.41%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.41%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.