PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 1.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 17.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RUN's 11.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.33%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
4.45%
G&A growth while RUN reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RUN's 5.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.40%
Similar total costs growth to RUN's 3.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-45.63%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 3.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.11%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 9.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 26.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 30.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 3.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 8.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-110.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.75%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 370.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-112.36%
Net income decline while RUN shows 2342.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.33%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 2228.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.94%
EPS decline while RUN shows 2332.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 2153.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 8.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.