PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-60.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.37%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.94%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.47%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.12%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.46%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 5.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-103.52%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2402.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3194.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.14%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-102.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.09%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 58.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-126.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-135.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-127.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.75%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.64%
Diluted share increase while RUN reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.