PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.43%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-19.53%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-42.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.12%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 22.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.15%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.29%
Operating expenses reduction while RUN shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.10%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 1.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.15%
D&A growth less than half of RUN's 1.91%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1856.65%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2390.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
64.58%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.91%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.61%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4449.22%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5635.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-264.15%
Tax expense reduction while RUN shows 106.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1454.16%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 51.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1823.58%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 43.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1511.76%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 52.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1581.48%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 52.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.