PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.38%
Revenue growth below 50% of RUN's 52.75%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.20%
Cost growth less than half of RUN's 78.69%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
102.35%
Positive growth while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
62.68%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-38.72%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 2.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
48.07%
G&A growth less than half of RUN's 270.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.34%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RUN's 155.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.79%
Total costs growth less than half of RUN's 112.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.79%
Interest expense growth less than half of RUN's 52.99%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-78.48%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 62.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1259.49%
Operating income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1032.20%
Operating margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
174.48%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
194.72%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
824.29%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
643.11%
Net margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
830.77%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 53.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.81%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 43.14%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.