1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.83%
Revenue growth below 50% of RUN's 19.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-3.36%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 11.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.37%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RUN's 78.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.37%
Margin expansion below 50% of RUN's 49.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.06%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.36%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.48%
Total costs growth less than half of RUN's 5.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.65%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.18%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 1.08%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
101.47%
EBITDA growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.46%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 7.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1056.53%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 20.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1048.70%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 33.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
220.00%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
241.07%
Pre-tax income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
239.91%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 12.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
53.58%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
255.43%
Net income growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
254.16%
Net margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
248.28%
EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
239.29%
Diluted EPS growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.84%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 3.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
13.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.