PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.91%
Revenue decline while RUN shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.65%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 14.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
41.64%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RUN's 10.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
55.49%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.78%
R&D growth while RUN reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-72.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.54%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.16%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.42%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.61%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 3.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-115.01%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 133.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.47%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
67.92%
Similar operating income growth to RUN's 67.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
64.78%
Similar operating margin growth to RUN's 71.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-106.72%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 125.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-145.34%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 45.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-149.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 52.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-179.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-262.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-278.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-258.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-258.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.21%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 2.20%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.38%
Diluted share reduction while RUN shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.