PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.05%
Cost reduction while RUN shows 0.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.74%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
30.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while RUN shows 5.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while RUN shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while RUN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RUN's 6.98%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.76%
Total costs reduction while RUN shows 2.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.47%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 7.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.05%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 3.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-259.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-279.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-279.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-301.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-954.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1064.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
142.96%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-817.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-909.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-825.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-825.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.