PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1784.74%
Cost increase while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-56.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.23%
R&D reduction while RUN shows 52.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1401.26%
G&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 32.84%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-12.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.11%
Operating expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-32.60%
Interest expense reduction while RUN shows 6.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6953.88%
D&A growth above 1.5x RUN's 8.92%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
64.53%
Similar EBITDA growth to RUN's 82.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
57.20%
EBITDA margin growth while RUN declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.93%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 85.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.89%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 84.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.17%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
55.33%
Similar pre-tax income growth to RUN's 62.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
46.10%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to RUN's 59.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
86.13%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.00%
Net income growth below 50% of RUN's 67.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of RUN's 64.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-294.44%
EPS decline while RUN shows 67.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
86.35%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 67.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while RUN shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.