1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.73%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 1.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.25%
Margin expansion while RUN shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-9.11%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.28%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 4.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-69.67%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 100.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.49%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 96.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
104.85%
Similar operating income growth to RUN's 96.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
105.19%
Similar operating margin growth to RUN's 96.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-89.65%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-82.70%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 88.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 88.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-82.70%
Net income decline while RUN shows 101.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Net margin decline while RUN shows 101.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.87%
EPS decline while RUN shows 101.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.76%
Diluted EPS decline while RUN shows 101.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of RUN's 0.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
115.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RUN's 14.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.