PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
91.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 31.87%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
95.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x SEDG's 27.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
78.70%
Similar gross profit growth to SEDG's 83.23%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-6.46%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
14.51%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
191.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SEDG's 22.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
107.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.91%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.79%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-32.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-113.57%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-111.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-481.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-89.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.26%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.50%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.50%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.95%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.76%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.