PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.58%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 27.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
22.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SEDG's 83.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.33%
Margin expansion 50-75% of SEDG's 38.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-149.74%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of SEDG's 22.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-6.33%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.41%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.66%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.97%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-226.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.73%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.93%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.