PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.00%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SEDG's 31.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
24.40%
Similar cost growth to SEDG's 27.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
13.01%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SEDG's 83.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.37%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
339.16%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 22.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.52%
Similar total costs growth to SEDG's 25.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-32.00%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.67%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.20%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.36%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of SEDG's 14.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
59.22%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.55%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.17%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-28.06%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
146.08%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
101.71%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
162.24%
Similar EPS growth to SEDG's 200.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
144.76%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SEDG's 200.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.71%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.00%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.