PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.83%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-48.11%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 27.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-62.76%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 83.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.70%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.19%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-67.25%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
128.20%
Other expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 1378.99%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.25%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.53%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.75%
Interest expense change of 48.75% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-11.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-88.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.00%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-507.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-101.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.89%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.54%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.54%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.