PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.27%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.65%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 27.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
81.85%
Similar gross profit growth to SEDG's 83.23%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
100.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 38.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-11.49%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.40%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.00%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.48%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
829.35%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
903.89%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.05%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
246.64%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.54%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
113.24%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
114.59%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.75%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
135.77%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
139.43%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
134.78%
EPS growth 50-75% of SEDG's 200.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
132.61%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SEDG's 200.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
1.71%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.03%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.