PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.98%
Growth of 13.98% while SEDG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-1.02%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
79.15%
Growth of 79.15% while SEDG shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
57.17%
Margin change of 57.17% while SEDG shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
14.33%
R&D change of 14.33% while SEDG maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
1.92%
G&A change of 1.92% while SEDG maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.56%
Operating expenses change of 5.56% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-0.28%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.05%
Interest expense change of 16.05% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.70%
D&A change of 0.70% while SEDG maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
135.64%
EBITDA change of 135.64% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
106.74%
Margin change of 106.74% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
257.73%
Income change of 257.73% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
213.85%
Margin change of 213.85% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-35.94%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
946.41%
Income change of 946.41% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
818.05%
Margin change of 818.05% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-201.53%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
453.98%
Income change of 453.98% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
386.03%
Margin change of 386.03% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
456.25%
EPS change of 456.25% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
386.67%
Diluted EPS change of 386.67% while SEDG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.31%
Share count change of 0.31% while SEDG is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
14.89%
Diluted share change of 14.89% while SEDG is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.