PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.65%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 45.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.85%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 47.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-42.24%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 40.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.99%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-3.29%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.86%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.08%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 33.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.30%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 6.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-67.86%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 33.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.18%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 54.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.68%
Operating income decline while SEDG shows 46.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.29%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 63.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.21%
Other expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 24.92%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-116.29%
Pre-tax income decline while SEDG shows 43.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-122.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 61.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-159.97%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 97.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-78.32%
Net income decline while SEDG shows 41.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.44%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 60.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.18%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.