PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SEDG's 11.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
10.97%
Cost growth 50-75% of SEDG's 15.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-177.61%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 2.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-172.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.80%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 22.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-29.30%
G&A reduction while SEDG shows 71.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 26.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.12%
Similar total costs growth to SEDG's 18.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
16.34%
Interest expense change of 16.34% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.76%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 25.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.87%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.93%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.06%
Operating margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-371.19%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 141.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-65.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-327.69%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 198.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 1.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.