PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.10%
Similar revenue growth to SEDG's 5.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
3.36%
Cost growth 50-75% of SEDG's 4.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
15.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 5.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.72%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.20%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 8.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.83%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 6.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.50%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SEDG's 4.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
1.90%
Interest expense change of 1.90% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
26.04%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
71.59%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 4.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
72.97%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 4.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.28%
Operating margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.35%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.59%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.57%
Pre-tax margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-81.50%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 16.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
42.88%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.65%
Net margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.48%
EPS growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.48%
Diluted EPS growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.29%
Share count reduction below 50% of SEDG's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.29%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.