PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-95.29%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-91.56%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.93%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.89%
Operating expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
32.39%
Interest expense change of 32.39% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-98.31%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 15.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-408.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-446.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.17%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.54%
Operating margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-671.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-79.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.35%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.26%
EPS growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2636.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.11%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.