PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1784.74%
Cost increase while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-56.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.23%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
1401.26%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-12.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.11%
Operating expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-32.60%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6953.88%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.53%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.20%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
83.17%
Other expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 366.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
55.33%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.13%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.00%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.70%
Net margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-294.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.35%
Diluted EPS growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while SEDG shows 0.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.